Assuming that only one of the officers, even of this Government, may have sometimes loved the over-measurements, I presume, he not having authority for doing so, such formation could be illegal and would constitute a claim for exemption from rents. Indeed, it would be strange if the rights of the Crown were to be trifled with, and to give in would seem to be giving way because some of the Police were requested to notice a crime committed, the criminal, when brought to justice, might make this a claim for remission of punishment.
The last thing to which I beg to draw your attention is the proposed line as indicated on the Surveyor-General's plan. On referring to that plan, you will see that the line is drawn so as to accommodate those holders who have made the most extensive encroachments, which would be well indeed if it did not interfere with adjoining Lots, rendering it a place very difficult to fill up to an extent beyond the wishes or may be the requirements of some of the holders. This is particularly evident with regard to Lots No. 50 and 63. There is no reason why the line should not be altered, not only reducing the extent to be filled in front of these two lots, but also reducing considerably the expense of building the sea-wall, as the difference in the depth of the water is considerable at that point.
I must further remind you that some time ago, a Petition was presented to Government by holders of Lots in the Lower Bazaar, who wished to extend their boundaries, and were willing to do so at their own expense, and pay accordingly.
Page 143
423
14%
Avamming ton that orny me of the officer
even of this Government mary
have sometimed Love of the
overvvelmente, I presume, he nut having authority for to doing, fuch fomation Comuld be illegal prud prever endd constitute a claim for exemption prou- Rents, sindeed it world be througe if the rights of the formon oned be to trifled with, and to sive it would fecum the Some out if, becauve
Live nie
of the Police.
reglested to pertice a crime committed, the Criminal puued, when brought to justice, make this a claim for remission of funnielement
draw
and
The lost thing to solrich I beg to how your attention in the proposed line ver indicated on the Surveyor - General's plan - On referring to theat flour you will be that
the live is to drawn auto overmodate these holders who have made the purst_
-
143 423
extensive onervaelements, cluich would be well indeed did it sist interfere to punct with adjoining Loto, rendering it place varry to fill up an extent beyond the wishes out may be the requirements of some of the lividly, ows is particularly boident with regard to the to Lite Nr. 50 and 63. Jom ke un reason why the live phould not be attered, then reduving the verevents be filled in front of these twos lots, but also reducing exviderably the expence of building the sea-wall, suive the diferens in the depth of the water is Envviderable at that finit
Immot further remind you Some time ago a Petition cous presented to Government by holders of Loto in the Lover Brzans, who wished to extend their boundaries, and are_ally to glid to do to at their non expence, and pay
& very
tt
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.